Early Access version 109

Thanks iA! Also what about this one:

3 Likes

No; they’re still the same enemy.

9 Likes

Have you checked this?

Also I have made good explaination about the blind spots of planetary egg city boss with a video of it above so can you fix that.

The Suggested Change: Make red lasers fires at the blind spots too.

2 Likes

So, I had an idea:
Can some asteroids carry hidden flasks inside of it? When the asteroid is broken, the flask break and releases a small area effect depending on its color that lasts for short amount of time.
(Can either normally appear in meteor/asteroid waves, or magnetic manipulator attacks, or both)

Whaddya think?
  • Yes
  • No

0 voters

1 Like

Just a problem: The % doesnt show so I cant unsure if i choose them correctly or not.
adaes

Also, just a remind.

2 Likes

Belongs more to the Chatting Place topic.

1 Like

Indeed.

1 Like

It was me. You could probably tell who it is from my PFP.

What?

1 Like

What do you mean by What?

1 Like

Can you precise what you mean? That it was you who suggested the idea?..

1 Like

Im the one who suggested to add a Danger Zone to the Bullet Rain wave.

1 Like

Yeah, but all you said was:

And then unlike you, I precised why that feature felt necessary like this:

2 Likes

IA,what about my wave idea ?

and you didn’t answer that .

This might be too late to suggest but I’ll do it anyway.
Right now, stasis zones and neutrons have similar colors, so in waves where there’s many alchemist and metal-suit chickens, a lot of stasis zones are gonna get thrown, making neutrons barely visible.
I suggest making neutrons more visible or changing the color of stasis zones. (If that’s possible)

Most UI elements with bright border have their colour defined as the border colour. The base will be darker anyway. If this is what you meant.

And yes, both asteroids and boss’ attacks can kill you.

Also I find the magnetic manipulator change quite dumb after all that time. Everybody (except maybe him) got used to it a long time ago. It’ll just look wrong now.

5 Likes

Already they added to v110 .

I don’t know where you got 17 seconds from, but Riddler overheats in 14 starting from :zap:5.

Power 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20
Riddler 16.500 16.000 15.500 15.000 14.500 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000 14.000

It needs to have that much due to its otherwise lackluster DPS. Sure, its damage is focused and it can dispatch single enemies very quickly, but it’s slower against crowds. 14 seconds also allows it to have another niche in having the highest total damage until overheat value from :zap:4 onward.

Riddler is not overpowered whatsoever. Actually, it’s one of my favourite reworks becuase it ended up being reasonably balanced while differing significantly from the rest of the roster just by stats alone.

I feel obliged to say that I don’t think this is particularly necessary. I understand the urge to make some of the weapons more complex and interesting, especially since all the projectile-based primary weapons simply deal damage as their only on-hit effect, but I’m not sure about adding such mechanics to existing weapons.

My memory is a bit dusty (and the WBP 2.0 group chat has been lost to time), but from what I recall, ricochet was originally planned as a potential solution to Riddler being underpowered after its first WBP revision - at the time, we were stuck testing a potential DPS increase using damage amps, and it was still so ridiculously ineffective that we thought our only options were buffing it into space or adding some secondary mechanic.
That of course didn’t happen, and Riddler turned out to be just fine after the rework for some eldritch reason, so all of that was shelved. I suppose it could be revived, but I don’t see much of a point. And besides, balancing multihit/AoE mechanics is, as we’ve learned the hard way, a big pain in this game.

5 Likes

So what does that mean?

You’re playing games with me, I don’t like this at all.

You want to complain about that? Then send a message to IA, he’s the one who gave me the idea medal. Because I’m not going to keep flooding this topic with an argument.

But let me say this: I did not steal your medal since I mentioned both of us. As a matter of fact, you should be glad of how nice I was to do the favor (especially in case you forgot that you suggested the same idea a few versions ago). But if I did steal, I would have only mentioned myself.

Now, let’s give this topic a rest, okay?

4 Likes