Millennium Hatchling Spacecraft idea!

[SolarFlare]

So i saw the very recent screenshot about the reworked Hen solo space craft and i thought to my self…why not own one! The way to get it is that of you won galactic cup OR CHL exclusive perk…maybe? OR a reward if you stayed at active for a whole year CONTINUOUSLY mean of you stayed inactive for 1 day you will have to wait to make that progress again…idk any ideas that MIGHT be useful?

[Starbrockle]

Already suggested way too many times.

If Hen Solo’s spacecraft is added, a copyright hammer will strike CIU.

[SolarFlare]

What why?!

[CattyCheese]

specifically

@InterAction_studios

There’s something called “fair use” in copyright Fair use - Wikipedia , and parody falls within it. Both the name of the character and the design of the spacecraft have been altered sufficiently so as to clearly allude to the original IP, but not infringe upon it.

More importantly, Hen Solo was a secondary character in CI4 that you only got to see for a minor portion of the game. Having his spacecraft as a purchasable item in CIU, however, would make it much more prominent and hence potentially cause copyright issues.

[SolarFlare]

Dyem bro

[SolarFlare]

HOLD YOUR HORSES THERE! if IA subjected for copyright then HOW THE F DIDN’T GET A STRIKE FOR USING DEATH ADER (the star wars villan AS A BOSS CHICKEN?!

[HuyTheKiller]

Apparently, the original Darth Vader isn’t a chicken.

[Recruit_75]

@InterAction_studios

More importantly, Hen Solo was a secondary character in CI4 that you only got to see for a minor portion of the game. Having his spacecraft as a purchasable item in CIU, however, would make it much more prominent and hence potentially cause copyright issues.

Darth Vader chicken only shows up occasionally, depending on how you’re playing missions

[SolarFlare]

Yeah and if you look closely they reused him as a chicken boss like what if disney saw this? Wouldn’t they file a copyright at em? Or they Disney just seems to be not caring at all!? IDK BRO

[Pans]

The answer is bright as day; Did you not read or intentionally did not understand?

@InterAction_studios

have been altered sufficiently so as to clearly allude to the original IP, but not infringe upon it.