Yeah seriously typos don’t deserve medals. A very specific nitpicky person is using them to farm medals.
Sigh, I forgot that Crl-F doesn’t search the whole thread on this site… Yeah that explains a lot.
I think my brain broke today xD
What, WBP didn’t do that already?
1 Like
That’s my point really. It’s like farming medals, and it just doesn’t feel original because it’s literally the same issue being reported over and over, and getting a medal for each report.
4 Likes
Took you long enough to notice that
1 Like
I already noticed it a long while ago, thank you very much 
I wasn’t exactly talking about you (singular). I was talking about you (plural).
1 Like
Hi guys.
I have a question.
Do I have to copy the data again after each game?or after update new version? 
What do you mean? You never have to copy your data to update.
Don’t worry about it, just don’t tamper with the save data
2 Likes
Or do you mean a backup copy? I would recommend before downloading and inſtalling the new verſion.
3 Likes
You technically do not need to backup for each version. But it’s recommended you do so, for an event where your data gets deleted or something. That way, you’ll have a way to restore.
1 Like
Intended, they are different enemies. They are weak to lightning weapons.
1 Like
Sigh…
I feel like people pointing out typos, grammatical errors, etc be it for english or for other languages after CIU exits EA should be awarded a different kind of medal because they’re not really bugs and as such shouldn’t be labelled as such. At the same time, players should be credit for improving the quality of the game, even if it’s a relatively minor fix like pointing out typos.
The last thing we want is players being turned off from CIU by a bunch of typos, grammatical errors and such.
It would decrease the quality of the game more than some might think. So I thus propose the introduction of a new kind of medal, one meant for people who point out such issues.
Be sure to give me your thoughts…
3 Likes
My thought: Suggested already.
Here you go:
4 Likes
Trust me, it is not really gonna break the game just because it’s invisible.
Intentional.
Prit bringing it up again was a good thing. Personally I had never even seen that reply.
Did you buy them before Early Access Version 36?
So I’m away for like a day and this topic just ballooned, so I’m sorry for replying to some buried posts here but I think these points are worth raising.
Also absurd hype for the entire WBP getting added next update!
I think this quip should just be removed anyway - it feels like it belongs in a much less polished game. I don’t like it. (No offense to whoever’s idea it was.)
Does Absolver really need the stuff it’s good at nerfed? It already gets obliterated on certain waves, so unless that gets changed then it needs some pushover waves too.
As someone who has used it rather extensively, I am confident in saying that it’s definitely not OP. Its “usefullness curve” might need to be leveled out a bit though (I’m actually in support of situational benefit/detriment situations, but it’s pretty extreme at both ends for absolver.)
Maybe it could be the “sub-header” title instead? That doesn’t appear in Wave Insight.
7 Likes