Sigh…
I feel like people pointing out typos, grammatical errors, etc be it for english or for other languages after CIU exits EA should be awarded a different kind of medal because they’re not really bugs and as such shouldn’t be labelled as such. At the same time, players should be credit for improving the quality of the game, even if it’s a relatively minor fix like pointing out typos.
The last thing we want is players being turned off from CIU by a bunch of typos, grammatical errors and such.
It would decrease the quality of the game more than some might think. So I thus propose the introduction of a new kind of medal, one meant for people who point out such issues.
So I’m away for like a day and this topic just ballooned, so I’m sorry for replying to some buried posts here but I think these points are worth raising.
Also absurd hype for the entire WBP getting added next update!
I think this quip should just be removed anyway - it feels like it belongs in a much less polished game. I don’t like it. (No offense to whoever’s idea it was.)
Does Absolver really need the stuff it’s good at nerfed? It already gets obliterated on certain waves, so unless that gets changed then it needs some pushover waves too.
As someone who has used it rather extensively, I am confident in saying that it’s definitely not OP. Its “usefullness curve” might need to be leveled out a bit though (I’m actually in support of situational benefit/detriment situations, but it’s pretty extreme at both ends for absolver.)
Maybe it could be the “sub-header” title instead? That doesn’t appear in Wave Insight.
Nope, you missed his point, that’s not what defines whether it was farming or not. I believe he was referring to the fact about 3/4 of the “Known bugs & New features” page was filled with " @OneWingLunarian ".
Suggesting stuff on Discord is kind of a problem on its own but whatever at this point.
I’d like to agree with both of these (especially the first one! Let me make my own character pls)
I’m happy to wait and see how it is in-game before I form an opinion. I will basically have to play a ton to get used to them, and change weapons frequently though, so it will take a long time to have any decent objective feedback beyond “cool”
That’s what bothered me too. I know some were already suggested, and I figured iA might check the older posts to see if they were suggested. Guess he didn’t.
Kinda too late for that now, but he could still remove the suggested ones and give the medals to the original posters instead.
Just my thoughts, but maybe little medals right at the bottom of the medal page that most people don’t even look at in a Chicken Invaders video game that’s not even released yet are not a super important or controversial thing to worry or argue about?