You’ll be awarded a whole port-a-potty next rank.
1 Like
Uh oh, there’s a no in the poll now lol
I mean there’ll always be someone who does this without leaving a reply. It’s bound to happen.
“no” refuses to elaborate further
So I just got murdered in a very unfair way.
Wheel of Fortune can spawn with gatlings that immediately fire on you.
Basically an insta death card if you don’t use any items.
Look, You got extremely limited movement space at the beginning and the guns fire at your location immediately when they appeared. How can that be skill issue?
Maybe have the gatlings wait for a few seconds before they open fire so you can actually have some time to prepare for it by making some room?
Yes, skill issue. There are players who successfully complete it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1gXE_hVUxM
Now if it were this wave, then unfortunately you are expected to use items.
hitbox issue. You won’t be able to thread the needle with a bigger ship.
Also, sometimes some projectiles are now rendering ahead of ICBM storms, but sometimes they don’t.
Some examples: Armored Chickens and Eggs from Gatling/Military Chickens render ahead of ICBM storms, but Eggs from Crazy Squawker aren’t.
PS: I like it more if all projectiles render ahead of ICBM storms, as it’ll help a lot with not dying in MP whenever someone joins only to spam ICBM everywhere.
I tried to measure distance and fuel required to travel between star system if I alter the current orbit planet. It turns out that off-road is depend on the precise location in the current star system but interstellar highway doesn’t, which implying even going off-road in the current star system cost fuel. This is not going to cost much but is it worth fixing?
As you can see in the example images above, by changing position in my current star system, I can save up to 27 fuel units (about 4,5 keys). Meanwhile travelling inside my star system doesn’t cost any fuel. The difference can be larger in huge star systems. Do you think off-road should only start using fuel when I actually leave the current star system?
You’ll find out soon enough.
Borderline, but no. It’s strictly a cosmetic change (the other two are not)
That’s because months are all assumed to have 31 days… but I have an idea.
Fixed in v.120 
Bug
Virtually all bosses spawn eggs/projectiles behind them, because it looks plain bad otherwise.
No
6 Likes
I wonder how is distance measured in interstellar highway method. I tried to travel from star system A to C, maybe through a intermediate star system B:
Distance from A to B: 454 units
Distance from B to C: 4314 units
Distance from A to C: 4678 units, though I expected it to be 454 + 4314 = 4768 units. The difference can cause using more fuel, so generally going through intermediates will waste more fuel than going strange to the destination.
How can you explain this?
Engine?
suuuuuure
3 Likes
All thrusters are classified engines in the filter. I wonder if you were being sarcastic or suggest changing “thruster” to “engine”.
This is bug. In fact I just don’t like how they keep two separate names that are kind of different.
2 Likes
I think thrusters refer to type of engines that applying propulsion and generally used to for the spacecraft. That’s why you don’t see the term “thruster” frequently for other vehicles. So classifying thrusters into engines is not wrong but “engine” can be a far larger term.
TL;DR: Thrusters are a type of engines.
Are you sure it is? 75 keys doesn’t seem strict to change, and besides, only 1 rename, the names after that will be paid for all spacecrafts.
I can poll it if you want.
It’s the warping of spacetime . I don’t remember the specifics, but when travelling through intermediate star systems, their radius is not taken into account (because you don’t travel all the way to the center and then back out). Also, I make some special adjustments depending on whether each star system is explored, and also whether it’s adjacent to an an explored system.
Originally, I thought that more engines could conceivably be added in the future that aren’t thrusters. But I think that ship has now long sailed, so yes, it could be made consistent. But I’d rather make both “thrusters” than both “engines”, which involves a lot of phrases 
Go for it.
7 Likes
New 2dB video:
25 Likes
KFC 2db productions.
Anyway for the poll:
Do you want the first spacecraft rename to be free?
- Yes.
- I don’t care.
- No.
0 voters
1 Like