That’s good. It encourages people to play with the rules instead of rely on a program to reach clicking speeds that are beyond human.
2 Likes
Wait, I thought I reported it first?
4 Likes
Is this “fixed” as in the ſame for each weapon? That’ll require a complete rework of certain weapons (ions ſpring to mind).
Given that moſt weapons are capped at 6,5 ſhots per ſecond and many players (or ſo I gather) are perfectly capable of clicking that faſt, I don’t really ſee the iſſue.
Although, I’ve never really underſtood why people would uſe an autoclicker as it ſeems like a way to reduce control. But then I’ve never ſeen one, ſo I don’t know what kind of UI they generally have.
1 Like
Power consumption is always negative. As you upgrade the weapon, more and more power is needed, so you get more and more negative.
4 Likes
I meant in the past. 20/s riddler.
1 Like
Sorry, fixed.
Not sure. Could be constant, could be dependent on the weapon. I don’t think it matters particularly.
What would need to happen before this boost is applied, however, is to reduce all of the weapons’ rate of fire (so boosting it would still keep it within reasonable bounds). Say, maybe reduce them to half-way between their current manual and auto values. The projectile damage and/or enemy health would be adjusted accordingly so there would be no perceivable gameplay change (just less projectiles on-screen, which actually has the side-benefit of improving game performance as well).
But that’s “phase 2”. First, manual firing will be removed altogether and rates will be set to their current maximum possible.
9 Likes
What about lightning, plaſma, and poſitron? How will clicking effect thoſe?
How is this a valid argument? Absence/existence of a feature is not a guarantee of its continued absence/existence. We didn’t have charging, splitting, chaining, heat-dependent damage, or area-of-effect in CI4. But we do now.
I don’t have any intention of changing the power levels of existing weapons. But I reserve the right to do so for any future weapon, that’s all I’m saying.
4 Likes
Eh, that’s kinda fair. New weapons don’t exactly need to follow that rule. At least there’s about 5 weapons that exist which are already “somewhat” tailored for competitive use.
At least new weapons can be somewhat more interesting and creative if they don’t exactly follow the same rules as the existing weapons.
(Plasma, Neutron, Utensil, Positron and Corn)
1 Like
Not really an argument, more of a question. I was simply curious.
Same. It would increase their firing rate (even though the beams look continuous, there’s still a periodic firing rate which controls how often damage is applied).
There’s an open issue with the Plasma, because there’s a benefit to manual firing (or, better put, individual firing) which I’d like to preserve without it being overridden by the overdrive mechanic*. So maybe overdrive will only be present in certain weapons rather than all of them.
* In fact, one of my main stumbling blocks currently is how to “disambiguate” overdrive from several individual clicks which occur close together.
2 Likes
Oh, and by the way: Suggest changes and ideas for casual players here! - #13 by OneWingLunarian
Just so you won’t miss it.
I don’t know. I guess because you can’t anticipate, schedule, or force ideas and inspiration. They come of their own accord.
Regardless, the game must evolve with the times.
There was a time when the game was keyboard-only, because that’s how it was done back then.
At some point, mouse control had to be introduced, because everyone else used mouse control. But it still was still mapped to keyboard keys (to make playing by either keyboard or mouse “fair”). As more and more players started using the mouse, that had to be eventually dropped (leading to the lopsidedness between keyboard/mouse control to this day).
It also used to be the case that you had to click for individual shots (you couldn’t just hold the fire button down). That also went out the window at some point because progress. I tried to hold on to that by providing a benefit to manual firing. And now we’re looking at doing away with manual firing completely.
These ideas were a product of their time. And, sadly, their time has come and gone. Part of me considers them very fundamental to the game (and would like to keep them that way), but if the game is going to survive another 20 years, I also need to be consciously evolving the mechanics, re-examining decisions, and questioning assumptions made under different circumstances.
12 Likes
By the way, how much do the rarities reduce the ship hitboxes by?
i remember when i had to play chicken invaders 1 with keyboard only it was fun. but in ci2 mouse control was introduced if i remember correctly?
-2px radius (so -4px, if you’re working with diameters) per rarity level.
9 Likes
@InterAction_studios also could the exhausts in customizing Spacecrafts have their own names and in Color themes I suggest the Reset to default option to be added in every option in it.
A large part of people here seem to confuse “casual” with “noob”. The important distinction to make here is that while “competitive” players play for the sake of competition, “casual” players play more for the fun of it. A casual player may be extremely skilled, and a competitive player can be a crappy one, and vice versa. Again, fun and quirky features make the game much richer. Although I will say that picking up Riddler is still practically a death sentence.
As a gamer, or a dev? Just curious.
I still play with keyboard.
@InterAction_studios when viewing a planet missions, could the screen zoom-in according to the planet size? Because if the planet is too big it’ll look like this:
A little creepy right?!
4 Likes
Also if I’m having Plasma Rifle and I collect a Plasma Rifle Gift, I will get the Plasma Rifle Bonus instead of Firepower Bonus.
@InterAction_studios is it possible to show the food while it’s counting, just like the points counting?
Also in this space burger wave can’t remember its name 
the Security Droid shoots as soon as it’s onscreen, could it be delayed a little?